California Probate Guardianships - No Contest Clauses in a Will or Trust May Not Apply to Minors
Posted on | October 9, 2008 |
A minor who nominated his mother as guardian ad litem (See What is a California Guardianship?) does not voluntarily participate in a probate proceeding triggering a no contest clause provision in a will or trust. Safai v. Safai, 164 Cal.App.4th 233 (2008).
“The Trust (What is a Revocable Living Trust?) and the will both included ‘no contest’ clauses, with the Trust’s clause stating, as follows: ‘Any beneficiary who directly or indirectly voluntarily participates in any proceeding or action in which such person seeks to void, nullify, or set aside (1) any provision of this instrument; (2) any provision of the Settlor’s will; or (3) any amendment of this instrument or codicil of the Settlor’s will shall be considered to have predeceased the execution of this instrument without surviving descendants[.] The provisions of this paragraph shall not apply to any disclaimer by any person of any benefit under this instrument. The Trustee is authorized to defend any contest or other attack of any nature on this instrument or any of its provisions.’”
The court reasoned that the settlor did not intend “to disinherit his only son in the event that [the son] contested the Trust while still a minor,” even though a “guardian or guardian ad litem is not a party to the action; instead, he or she is a representative of record of a party who lacks capacity to sue.” Thanks to Professor Beyer for bringing this case to my attention.
Tags: ad litem > attorney > california > challenging a will > guardian > how to challenge a will or trust > lawyer > no contest clause > Probate > probate law > san diego > trust dispute > will contest
Comments
Leave a Reply
START HERE - ESTATE PLANNING BASICS
Subscribe to our feed
Admin
Important Disclaimer
No attorney/client relationship has been formed between the Law Office of Roy Newman and you by your use of this blog. It is not reasonable to rely on general legal information as a substitute for the personal face to face counsel of an attorney regarding the specific facts of your case. Likewise, do not use the comment system to obtain legal advice. The comment system is designed for feedback regarding topics of general interest to the community, not the specific facts of your case, and therefore the Law Office of Roy Newman will not establish an attorney/client relationship through that system. Such comments may be ignored and you will not receive a timely response, therefore jeopardizing your rights (triggering the loss of money or property), so do not use the system for that purpose. The information on this site should not be considered wholly accurate. For example, it may become outdated, may or may not be updated, and is not nearly comprehensive enough to protect your rights on a case by case basis.
Directories
