Who Owns Heath Ledger’s Oscar? A Primer in Wills, Trusts, and Guardianship Laws

Posted on | February 24, 2009 | 2 Comments

Before he died, Heath Ledger executed a will (see “What Happens If I Die Without a Will?”) giving his entire estate to his parents and daughter, Matilda. The parents disclaimed any rights to the estate, giving 3 year old Matilda $20 million. Since her parents made the disclaimer, the Oscar statuette then passes to Matilda. However, the Academy has a policy – winners are forced to sign a right of first refusal contract with the Academy – stating that before the actor or actress agrees to sell their Oscar they must first offer the Academy the opportunity to purchase it for $1. This essentially prevents actors from selling the statuette to the highest bidder, thus diluting the brand. Nevertheless, because of Matilda’s age, she cannot legally sign the document until she reaches the age of majority.

A court appointed guardian (see “Why Do I Need a Guardian For My Child?”) could control the statuette until she turns 18, but cannot make a promise that legally binds a child after the child reaches 18, thus exposing the Oscar to possible sale by Matilda. The Academy’s solution was to place the Oscar in trust (see “What Are the Advantages of a Trust?”) naming Matilda’s mother, Michelle Williams as trustee. When Matilda reaches the age of 18, the trust will release the Oscar to her provided she signs the agreement. If she does not, the Oscar must be returned to the Academy.

The Estate Tax Will Not Dissappear Under Obama

Posted on | January 15, 2009 | No Comments

The Wall Street Journal is reporting that Barack Obama will block the disappearance of the estate tax in 2010. It is being reported that the Senate Finance Committee will reverse the rollbacks that were being phased in slowly since 2001. As reported earlier on this blog, the Obama campaign plan would exempt estates worth up to $3.5 million with the remainder taxed at 45%. The majority of estates – up to 98% - will pass without being taxed.

Last Will and Testament of Paul Newman Admitted to Probate

Posted on | November 25, 2008 | No Comments

The last will and testament of Paul Newman has been admitted to probate. You can see a copy of his last will and codicil here (See “What Will Happen if I Die Without a Will?”). Mr. Newman directed that his race cars and airplanes be sold for fair market value with the proceeds to be passed to the residuary. His Oscars and other awards will pass to Newman’s Own Foundation, and trusts were established to handle his various businesses (Mr. Newman could have avoided the publicity of probate entirely by using a trust – see “Advantages of a Living Trust”). Thanks to Professor Beyer for finding the article.

The State of Estate Planning After the Election: Obama’s Proposed Estate Tax Plan

Posted on | November 6, 2008 | No Comments

The dust has begun to settle after the election - and both the legislative and executive branches are controlled by the Democratic Party. If Obama’s estate tax plan becomes law, the $3.5 million exemption of 2009 would be retained, but amounts in excess of that would be taxed at 45%. The top tax rates of prior years (for dual earners over $250,000 or one earner of over $200,000) would be reinstated 26% or more. Additionally, investors who make more than $250,000 per year would see an increase in the capital gains tax to up to 20%.

California Probate Guardianships - No Contest Clauses in a Will or Trust May Not Apply to Minors

Posted on | October 9, 2008 | No Comments

A minor who nominated his mother as guardian ad litem (See What is a California Guardianship?) does not voluntarily participate in a probate proceeding triggering a no contest clause provision in a will or trust. Safai v. Safai, 164 Cal.App.4th 233 (2008).

“The Trust (What is a Revocable Living Trust?) and the will both included ‘no contest’ clauses, with the Trust’s clause stating, as follows: ‘Any beneficiary who directly or indirectly voluntarily participates in any proceeding or action in which such person seeks to void, nullify, or set aside (1) any provision of this instrument; (2) any provision of the Settlor’s will; or (3) any amendment of this instrument or codicil of the Settlor’s will shall be considered to have predeceased the execution of this instrument without surviving descendants[.] The provisions of this paragraph shall not apply to any disclaimer by any person of any benefit under this instrument. The Trustee is authorized to defend any contest or other attack of any nature on this instrument or any of its provisions.’”

The court reasoned that the settlor did not intend “to disinherit his only son in the event that [the son] contested the Trust while still a minor,” even though a “guardian or guardian ad litem is not a party to the action; instead, he or she is a representative of record of a party who lacks capacity to sue.” Thanks to Professor Beyer for bringing this case to my attention.

Steve Fossett’s Remains May Have Been Found

Posted on | October 3, 2008 | No Comments

Steve Fossett, the adventurer who disappeared while in flight over Nevada’s desert, may have finally been found in California. The disappearance raised probate issues (What is California Probate?) when his wife petitioned the probate court to declare him legally dead and to probate his will (What Will Happen If I Die Without a Will?). Crash investigators have found a “very small” amount of human remains at the crash site and described the crash as “very high impact.”

Heath Ledger’s Daughter Will Inherit His Entire Estate

Posted on | October 2, 2008 | No Comments

Heath Ledger’s daughter Matilda will apparently inherit his entire $16.3 million estate. The actor executed a will (What Are the Advantages of a Will?) that left nothing to his daughter, but left everything to his parents and three sisters. Those family members have allegedly gifted those distributions to Matilda.

How To Find A Good Wills, Trusts, or Probate Attorney In San Diego?

Posted on | September 30, 2008 | 2 Comments

What is the best way to find a good estate planning or probate lawyer in San Diego? First, the Law Office of Roy Newman can provide excellent estate planning services for a wide variety of estates. Even if you do not choose to use us, you should contact the office so that I can help you find an attorney that will meet your needs. There are many resources that can help you find an attorney – but not all of them will produce an optimal result.

Will I Inherit from My Husband or Parent If I Kill Them (Part II)? The Answer Could be Yes

Posted on | September 26, 2008 | No Comments

A Wisconsin court has ruled that giving a loaded shotgun to a suicidal parent is not the proximate cause of the parent’s death (although it is the actual or but-for cause), so that a wife and daughter of the man may inherit his $500,000 estate. The man was terminally ill with lymphoma and his wife and daughter took him directly from the hospital (where he had only a one day pass to leave) to a cabin, gave him the loaded shotgun and left him.

The Wisconsin Slayer Statute (Read here about California’s Slayer Statute – Will I Inherit from My Parents if I Kill Them? Part I) prohibits those who “intentionally kill” another from inheriting from the person. California’s statute has basically the same language, and it is not clear what the result would be on the same facts here. The wife and daughter were embattled in probate litigation (See What is Probate?), and the case will likely be heard by the Wisconsin Supreme Court. You can read the full story here.

Tax Shelters: Offshore Asset Protection Trusts Become a Political Hot Button

Posted on | September 25, 2008 | No Comments

Barack Obama has aired a new ad accusing John McCain of favoring offshore asset protection trusts that operate as tax shelters in Bermuda. McCain is alleged to have taken $50,000 while on a lobbyist supported vacation from those who have benefited from the trusts. You can see the ad here, courtesy of the Huffington Post.

For more on the current state of asset protection trusts, read:

Eight Signs Your California Tax Shelter or Offshore Asset Protection Trust Is Actually Tax Evasion

Criminal Tax Evasion - Trouble Ahead for San Diego Asset Protection Lawyers and Attorneys?

Offshore Trusts and Asset Protection Trusts Are Among 10 Things Millionaires Won’t Tell You About

California Executor and Personal Representative Duties: Filing the Estate Tax Return

Posted on | September 24, 2008 | No Comments

If you are appointed as executor, administrator, or personal representative (What are the duties of a personal representative?) of an estate, you are responsible for filing a tax return. An estate tax return must be filed within 9 months of the decedent’s death. Internal Revenue Code §6075. You may file for an extension for no more than 6 months. IRC § 6081. If you fail to file a timely return, the IRS will assess a penalty equal to 5% of the amount required to be shown as tax on the delinquent return for each month during which the return remains delinquent.

The only way to avoid the penalty is to show that the failure to file was due to “reasonable cause” and not “willful neglect.” Reasonable cause is established where, despite the exercise of ordinary business care and prudence, a taxpayer is unable to timely file. Willful neglect is a “conscious, intentional failure or reckless indifference.” Reasonable cause may be established by relying upon the advice of an attorney. “However, a taxpayer’s reliance on the advice of an attorney with respect to matters such as meeting filing deadlines generally does not constitute reasonable cause.” Estate of Gertrude Zlotowski, Docket No. 22150-04 (July 24, 2007). In addition, relying solely on an attorney’s advice is likely an impermissible delegation of your duties as a personal representative of the estate.

“Congress has placed the burden of prompt filing on the executor, not on some agent or employee of the executor” except in a very narrow range of situations (such as erroneous advice that a return was not needed at all). United States v. Boyle, 469 U.S. 241, 249-250 (1985). If you are preparing to assume the duties of a California personal representative, it is important that you consult with a San Diego probate lawyer who can provide guidance on return preparation, filing deadlines, and other issues that could land you in hot water should you fail to spot them.

How Much Does Probate Cost In California?

Posted on | September 23, 2008 | No Comments

Probate is an expensive proposition in California. The cost will vary depending upon the size of the estate, but one thing is guaranteed – your estate will pay much more than the cost of a living trust. San Diego probate fees include the cost of filing, notice of publication in the San Diego Union Tribune, real property appraisal by the probate referee, a probate bond, attorney’s fees, and executor’s fees. The TLD legal blog estimates that the probate of a $500,000 estate will generate $28,035 in costs and fees.

California Probate Litigation: The Heirs of Superman’s Creators Reclaim His Copyright

Posted on | September 22, 2008 | 1 Comment

The executors (See “What is a California Personal Representative?“) of Superman’s estate – Joanne Siegal and Laura Siegal Larson – have successfully reclaimed the estate’s half of Jerome Siegal’s copyright of Superman by terminating its grant to Warner Brothers, Time Warner, and DC Comics.

The opinion is an interesting read on the creation and promotion of Superman, and also goes into some detail about the treatment of Siegal (and his co-creator Joseph Shuster) by the companies. Apparently, DC Comics had given them very little money in return for the copyright – until a 1961 New York Times article pointed out they were nearly “destitute” and living with “threadbare furniture” in “cramped apartments.” You can find the opinion here Siegel v. Warner Bros. Entertainment Inc., 542 F. Supp. 2d 1098, (C.D. Cal., 2008), thanks to Professor Beyer for highlighting the article.

Who May Write a Will? Requirements to Make a California Will

Posted on | September 21, 2008 | No Comments

Who may write a will in San Diego? Any person that is eighteen years of age and of sound mind may write a will (But should you? See Will Advantages; and Disadvantages of a Will). A person is of sound mind if they understand the rights, risks, and consequences of the testamentary act, the property they own, and their living descendents.

A person is not mentally competent if they lack the mental capacity to understand the nature of the testamentary act, understand and recollect the nature and situation of the individual’s property, or remember and understand the individual’s relations to living descendants, spouse, and parents.

In addition, a person may lack capacity to write a will if they have a deficit in mental function, such as alertness, information or thought processing. Of course, a court will not probate (See What is Probate?) a will where the person is insane, defined as a false conception of reality, a belief in supposed facts against all evidence and probability.

How Do I Revoke My Will? Will Revocation – How to Revoke a Will In California

Posted on | September 19, 2008 | No Comments

A will is a living, breathing legal document (See “What Will Happen if I Die Without a Will?”. There are many ways in which people have tried – and failed – to revoke California wills (See “Advantages of a Will” and “Disadvantages of a Will“) that have produced unexpected and unintended results. Just like in drafting a will, there are traps for the unwary that could preclude a person from receiving a gift, or force an unintended sale of a widow’s home. In order to properly revoke a will, it is best to consult a San Diego estate planning attorney.

Arguably the best (and certainly most common) way to revoke a will is by a subsequent will, either expressly or by inconsistency. California Probate Code § 6120(a). A will may also be revoked by physical act, like being burned, torn, canceled or obliterated with the intent and the purpose of revoking it by the testator. California Probate Code §6120(b). A will may also be revoked unintentionally by operation of law, such as if the will is lost, by dissolution of marriage, or by improper execution.

If you fail to properly revoke your will, it remains a living document and will be admitted to probate court (See “What is Probate?”) along with your other testamentary documents. It is not advisable to attempt “cross-outs” (revocation by interlineation) on the face of the document in order to increase a devise to another. Crossing out a gift in a will does not actually increase a devise to another person who would receive part of a gift (such as a share of a home or bank account). Likewise, crossing out a term with additions to the face of the document will likely be invalid unless they meet the legal requirements for a valid will. If you have questions, be certain to direct them to a qualified San Diego estate lawyer before attempting a will revocation, your beneficiaries will thank you.

Criminal Tax Evasion - Trouble Ahead for San Diego Asset Protection Lawyers and Attorneys?

Posted on | September 18, 2008 | No Comments

In a previous article, “Eight Signs Your California Tax Shelter or Offshore Asset Protection Trust Is Actually Tax Evasion,” I pointed out that several partners were in trouble at Arnold and Porter for promoting abusive tax shelters. The current state of charges, indictments, and investigations against other firms are almost too numerous to count.

Indictments against KPMG were thrown out by a New York appellate court (not on the merits, but because the government “interfered with defendants’ relationship with counsel“), yet charges are currently pending against Ernst & Young as well as several law firms. Ernst & Young has been snagged in an investigation in which Ernst set up illegal tax shelters for wealthy citizens seeking to hide income or conceal it as capital gains. But the investigation of Ernst has led to interesting revelations that have entangled estate planning lawyers in criminal and possibly civil charges.

Ernst & Young asked “friendly law firms to write opinion letters assuring the taxpayers that the shelters were ‘likely’ to pass muster should the IRS investigate their legality. In return, the firms received a fixed fee for each case–usually $50,000, but at times up to $150,000, according to court records.” The case is currently being tried in New York, but will surely have a ripple effect at the San Diego branch offices of the big accounting firms, including any local San Diego estate planning lawyers that have written such opinion letters.

Those that lost money will likely be able to recoup their losses against the firms through malpractice cases. Several rules of California professional responsibility are violated by such an arrangement (especially if their interests were not disclosed) and the case for professional negligence is strong. The firms would likely seek to avoid the limelight, so they would probably attempt to settle to avoid public embarrassment.

The State of San Diego Estate Planning: Most Lack A Will, Trust, or Health Care Directive

Posted on | September 17, 2008 | No Comments

If San Diego estate planning is anything like the rest of the nation, it is in pretty bad shape. The National Association of Estate Planners & Councils has planned the third week of October for a National Estate Planning Awareness week. The reasons for the promotion?

• 70% of Americans do not have a basic will - those that have a will fail to keep it updated.
• 79% do not have a living trust
• 69% do not have a living will or advance healthcare directive

Surprisingly, up to 74% of parents do not have a last will and testament, and cite choosing a guardian as a deterrent.

The council is preparing promotional materials for local affiliates to hold presentations for the public. You can find updates at the council’s website. Thanks to the PA Elder Blog for bringing this story to my attention. As of right now, the website for the local San Diego chapter is down, check back here for updates.

California Probate Court Correctly Denied Use of Frozen Sperm by Widow

Posted on | September 16, 2008 | No Comments

A California probate court [See "What is California Probate?"] correctly ruled that a widow was not entitled to her dead husband’s frozen sperm, held the California Court of Appeal (Third District). Estate of Kievernagel, C055516 ( 9/11/08). The issue was whether Joseph Kievernagel would have wanted his wife, Iris Kievernagel, to have the sperm after his death. The sperm preservation agreement provided for two options upon the death of Joseph, either it would be donated to Iris or destroyed. Joseph initialed by the latter option, and both husband and wife signed the document. Joseph died in a helicopter crash in 2005.

Iris was appointed administrator [See "California Personal Representative"] of Joseph’s estate and then petitioned the probate court for a preliminary distribution of an “asset of no financial value” but “of immense sentimental value to the widow.” Joseph’s parents contested the preliminary distribution, claiming that it was against the testamentary intent of Joseph.

Frozen sperm falls within the broad definition of property in California Probate Code §62. Hecht v. Superior Court (1993) 16 Cal.App.4th 836, 846. This court agreed with Hecht that “gametic material, with its potential to produce life, is a unique type of property and thus not governed by the general laws relating to gifts or personal property or transfer of personal property upon death.” Estate of Kivernagel. Presumably, this means that a person can dispose of sperm or embryos in an instrument (or perhaps without any instrument at all) that does not meet the requirements of a formal will [See "Advantages of a Will"] – because the sperm bank agreement at issue was not properly witnessed. “Accordingly, in determining the disposition of Joseph’s frozen sperm, the trial court properly relied on Joseph’s intent as to its use after his death.” Id.

The probate court may find such testamentary intent by a preponderance of the evidence. Id. What is interesting is that this holding opens up the possibility of probate litigation over just what the intent of the donor was in the case of a cryogenic agreement that fails to specify what will happen to the genetic material after death. Nevertheless, in this case the written agreement was in place, and Joseph’s intent that the sperm be destroyed upon his death controlled.

How Do You Make Sure Your Last Will and Testament is Honored? “Blackmail” Your Beneficiaries.

Posted on | September 15, 2008 | No Comments

A will (see “Advantages of a Will”) drafted under California law cannot violate public policy. For example, a San Diego probate court (see “Disadvantages of San Diego Probate”) will not enforce a clause that dictates the commission of a crime or specifies that the beneficiary must divorce a named spouse before a gift from the will is delivered.

But in a textbook lesson in how to write a will, Bruce Ivins, the man who committed suicide after becoming the primary suspect in the anthrax mailings which killed 5 people in 2001, created a will that skirts those public policy concerns. Ivans knew that his wife stoutly opposed abortion – she served as president of Frederick County’s Right to Life movement – and also that she might not honor his request that his remains be cremated. So he proposed that “If my remains are not cremated and my ashes are not scattered or spread on the ground, I give to Planned Parenthood of Maryland” a $50,000 gift from the estate. He knew that his wife would oppose the gift and would therefore be coerced into honoring his request.

Apparently, his threatened gift has spurred the family to action. His cremated remains are stored at a funeral home while Maryland probate lawyers seek advice from the probate court on how to provide detailed proof to the probate court (as directed under his will) that the remains were cremated and scattered. A California probate court (”What is California Probate?”) would likely follow the result, which gives will drafters added incentive to create alternative dispositions to enforce testamentary intent. Read more here.

Eight Signs Your California Tax Shelter or Offshore Asset Protection Trust Is Actually Tax Evasion

Posted on | September 14, 2008 | No Comments

Now that the big accounting firms have been stung by IRS investigations, indictments, and convictions of the promoters of off the shelf tax shelters (like the POPS, PICOs, and FOCUS of Arnold and Porter), they have largely stopped offering speculative “investments” and offshore asset protection trusts. Now “a few smaller accounting and regional law firms, which are increasingly offering individual investors complex tax transactions, some custom-designed” are beginning to come under the scrutiny of the IRS.

In no particular order, here are the eight signs that your tax shelter could result in a criminal charges:

1. Tax savings that greatly outweigh the amount you initially put forth.
2. When an accountant or tax lawyer tells you that the financial transaction poses no risk.
3. When you are asked to sign a confidentiality agreement (so that you can’t get a second opinion).
4. A return that dramatically changes your tax liability when compared to previous years (which raises red flags at the IRS).
5. The profit of the transaction is insubstantial when compared to the tax savings.
6. It is a “deal done by very smart people that, absent tax considerations, would be very stupid.”
7. It sounds too good to be true.
8. You believe your tax shelter was built by God.

Of course, keeping money offshore in an asset protection trust is not against the law. But failing to declare those assets to the IRS is a violation of tax law, because the United States taxes on the basis of citizenship, not borders. Click here to read the New York Times article.

keep looking »

Recently Written

• Who Owns Heath Ledger’s Oscar? A Primer in Wills, Trusts, and Guardianship Laws
• The Estate Tax Will Not Dissappear Under Obama
• Last Will and Testament of Paul Newman Admitted to Probate
• The State of Estate Planning After the Election: Obama’s Proposed Estate Tax Plan
• California Probate Guardianships - No Contest Clauses in a Will or Trust May Not Apply to Minors
• Steve Fossett’s Remains May Have Been Found
• Heath Ledger’s Daughter Will Inherit His Entire Estate
• How To Find A Good Wills, Trusts, or Probate Attorney In San Diego?
• Will I Inherit from My Husband or Parent If I Kill Them (Part II)? The Answer Could be Yes
• Tax Shelters: Offshore Asset Protection Trusts Become a Political Hot Button

Categories

• About This Blog
• Asset Protection Trusts
• Business Planning
• Charities and Charitable Giving
• Current Events
• Estate Administration
• Estate Planning - Generally
• Estate Planning of the Rich and Famous
• Estate Tax
• Gifts and Gift Tax
• Offshore Trusts
• Powers of Attorney and Living Wills
• Premarital Agreements
• Probate
• Probate Litigation
• San Diego Estate Planning
• Tax
• Trusts
• Uncategorized
• Will Contests
• Wills
• Wills and Trusts

Archives

• February 2009
• January 2009
• November 2008
• October 2008
• September 2008
• August 2008
• July 2008
• June 2008
• May 2008
• April 2008
• March 2008

Blogroll

• Connecticut Elder Law Blog
• Death and Taxes Blog
• Estate Planning Law Firm of Louisiana
• Florida Estate Planning Blog
• Florida Estate Planning Lawyer Blog
• Florida Probate
• International Tax Forum
• Jacksonville Estate Planning
• North Carolina Estate Planning Blog
• Ohio Estate Planning, Trust & Probate Law
• Pennsylvania Fiduciary Litigation
• Southern California Estate Planning Blog
• Texas Probate Litigation
• The Ohio Trust & Estate Blog
• Utah Business and Estate Planning Blog
• Wills, Trusts, & Estates Professor Blog
• Wisconsin Criminal Defense and Bicycle Injury
• Wisconsin Estate Planning and Tax Law Blog (Nathan J. Dosch)

The San Diego Estate Center

Need a will or trust? Asset protection or business planning? Guardianship or conservatorship? Get a free case review! Contact the Law Offices of Roy Newman by clicking here or simply call 1(877)DO-MY-PROB [1(877)366-9776].

Search

START HERE - ESTATE PLANNING BASICS

• About This Site
• California Wills
  • California Will Definitions
  • What Will Happen If I Die in California Without: A Will, A Valid Will, Or Partially Valid Will.
  • The Advantages of Creating a Simple Will in California
  • The Disadvantages of a Simple Will In California
• California Trusts - What Is a Revocable Living Trust?
  • California Revocable Living Trust Overview
    • Living Trust Advantages
    • Living Trust Disadvantages
    • California Living Trusts: Scams and Misconceptions
  • California A-B Trusts
  • Irrevocable Trusts
    • Irrevocable Life Insurance Trust
    • Irrevocable Charitable Remainder Trusts
  • Testamentary Trusts
• California Powers of Attorney
  • California’s Living Will - The Advance Health Care Directive
  • Durable Power of Attorney for Financial Purposes
• California Probate
  • What is California Probate?
  • California Personal Representative – Duties and Liabilities
  • California Conservatorship: Conservator of the Person, and Conservator of the Estate
  • What is a Guardianship? California Guardianships In San Diego Probate Court
    • Why You Need A Guardian and How to Choose a Guardian
• Contact

Subscribe to our feed

Admin

• Log in
• Wordpress
• XHTML

Important Disclaimer

No attorney/client relationship has been formed between the Law Office of Roy Newman and you by your use of this blog. It is not reasonable to rely on general legal information as a substitute for the personal face to face counsel of an attorney regarding the specific facts of your case. Likewise, do not use the comment system to obtain legal advice. The comment system is designed for feedback regarding topics of general interest to the community, not the specific facts of your case, and therefore the Law Office of Roy Newman will not establish an attorney/client relationship through that system. Such comments may be ignored and you will not receive a timely response, therefore jeopardizing your rights (triggering the loss of money or property), so do not use the system for that purpose. The information on this site should not be considered wholly accurate. For example, it may become outdated, may or may not be updated, and is not nearly comprehensive enough to protect your rights on a case by case basis.

Directories